Pathogen Chip Sensitivity
CREATED: 200701051243 ** Pathogen Chip
- sensitivity not as high as real time PCR (traditional method) due to cross hybridization
- microarray with 40-mer problems, tiling array
- microarray is based on whole genome whereas real time PCR only selects a specific portion of the virus genome may fail to detect if there are mutations in that region
** Decting unknown virus
- amplify using random PCR
- hybridize with chip
- check expression
** Random PCR
- primer consists of fix head - variable tail
- tail portion consists of all possible letters to match different parts of virus RNA
- problems - inefficient amplification ** need both forward and reverse primer to bind ** distance from 500 to 1000 bp for PCR to work
- factors which affect binding ** temperature, different primer require different temperature as binding strength of A-T != C-G ** intra primer secondary structure
- solution - build model to estimate probability of forward/backward primer binding at site i
- base on this probability, compute an Amplification Efficiency Score (AES)
- AES correlates well with hybridization signal intensity
** Application of AES
- predict signal intensity of different regions
- find better random primers ** head portion of primer also affects binding ** select head that have high AES for more regions
** Detection of pathogen
- t-statistic of average signal ** high false positive ** some false negative
- Observation: real virus has heavy tail ** use KL divergence to check difference in shape ** put more importance in tail portion -> weighted KL (WKL)
** Reference
- Ken Sung
- related to idea of Peptide Detectability by Haixu Tang